The True Nature of Twitter's Influence

To understand Twitter's actual impact, we need to consider how it amplifies voices. The platform's primary function is to allow a select few to reach a vast audience. Essentially, it enables those already in positions of power to disseminate their thoughts and ideas to millions. This phenomenon has been evident with various public figures like celebrities, politicians, and business leaders.

These individuals have always been under scrutiny from the media, but Twitter provides a direct line for them to communicate with their followers swiftly. If their opinions are misguided or unfounded, they can spread misinformation even faster. I currently have around 1,500 followers on this platform, and if I actively promoted myself on Twitter, I could easily double that number. This is amplification—changing the reach, not the message.

Many on the left believe that Musk's ownership will lead to increased misinformation. Perhaps, but the platform is already rife with it. Concerns about figures like Donald Trump potentially returning to the platform seem misplaced; the damage was done long before his ban.

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Additionally, Twitter has become a convenient source for journalists who prefer to quote individuals rather than engage in direct interviews. This practice can often lead to the misrepresentation of someone's views. Ownership changes are unlikely to affect this trend.

One could argue that Twitter serves as a venue for practicing wit and humor, with many users responding to news events with sarcasm. While this might enhance improvisational skills, similar exchanges could occur on platforms like Reddit or during live performances.

Lastly, Twitter is infamous for allowing users to dredge up old posts to publicly shame others. Some may see this as a form of justice, but I argue it fosters negative behaviors, such as self-righteousness through public condemnation.

Photo by Keagan Henman on Unsplash

Who Uses Twitter and Musk's Influence

So, who comprises Twitter's user base? Unfortunately, too many individuals. Among them are fervent political supporters, trolls, and those perpetually seeking to be offended.

Users often become more polarized when they invest too heavily in public figures. Those unable to distinguish between reliable and false information can easily find themselves spiraling into radical beliefs. The easily offended will continue to discover new triggers with every scroll.

These trends are disconcerting and far from novel. Despite our growing awareness of social media's adverse effects, we still engage with these platforms as we did in 2008. Social media presents a Faustian bargain, trading personal well-being for the allure of endless information and engagement.

Part of this issue is the way social media amplifies existing societal weaknesses. While it does not create these flaws, it certainly encourages and exploits them. Humans are prone to biases and conflicts, and we should strive to counteract our worst instincts, steering clear of environments that nurture them.

I have chosen to abstain from alcohol and avoid environments that might trigger negative behavior. Likewise, if social media incites frustration, spreads misinformation, or hampers productivity, it may be time to step back. For many, returning to these sites resembles an addict's struggle to pass by a bar without succumbing.

Musk's Ownership and its Implications

Now, let's examine Musk's influence—his presence alone can polarize opinions. While many admire him, an equal number harbor disdain. Reactions to his takeover bid reflect the same divisions present in other Musk-related discussions.

Some users have vowed to leave the platform entirely upon his assumption of control. To that, I say—fantastic! Anything that encourages individuals to detach from toxic content deserves support. If Musk were to collaborate with figures like Hillary Clinton in this endeavor, it might even prompt more users to exit Twitter.

Ultimately, we must recognize that the core issue with these platforms isn't solely their ownership. The more significant problem lies with us, the users. We alone are accountable for how we engage with social media.