# Why Volcanoes Aren't the Solution for Waste Disposal
Written on
Chapter 1: The Waste Dilemma
In recent times, waste generation has become a pressing issue. Landfills are overflowing, recyclable materials are being rejected, and the infamous garbage patch in our oceans continues to expand. On average, an American produces around 1,700 pounds of waste each year, a significant portion of which is not recycled—often due to the cost prohibitions associated with the process. Much of the plastic waste people attempt to sort ultimately ends up in landfills.
So, why not consider throwing it all into a volcano?
While this idea might sound whimsical, akin to a child's fanciful suggestion, it raises important questions about its feasibility. Could we simply bury our waste beneath layers of lava, effectively removing it from our sight for eons?
Section 1.1: The Density Problem
The first major challenge of dumping garbage into a volcano is the density of lava.
Lava is molten rock, which is extremely dense. When you toss an object like an unwanted toaster into water, it sinks because it is denser than the water. However, your kitchen appliance is not denser than lava, which means it would float on the surface instead of disappearing. This would result in burning trash rather than a neat disposal solution, producing harmful smoke and fumes that would pollute the air.
Section 1.2: The Pollution Factor
Moreover, volcanoes lack the filtration systems found in industrial incinerators.
When waste is burned in an incinerator, it can generate electricity for nearby communities and is equipped with scrubbers to minimize air pollutants. In contrast, a volcano offers no such benefits; incinerating waste in a volcano would release more pollutants into the atmosphere, posing health risks to nearby residents and contributing to climate change.
Chapter 2: Safety and Practicality Concerns
The first video, "Why Don't We Throw Trash in Volcanoes?" explores the impracticality of this idea, highlighting the risks involved.
Even if we decided to disregard these pollution concerns, there are significant safety issues. Active volcanoes are not easily accessible, requiring long treks from populated areas. Building roads to transport waste would be perilous during eruptions, and airlifting heavy trash would be prohibitively expensive.
Secondly, introducing foreign materials into lava can trigger violent reactions. For instance, when liquid organic waste was introduced into a volcano, it resulted in a rapid expansion of steam, causing explosive eruptions—an outcome that would endanger anyone nearby.
The second video, "What if We Toss All Our Trash in an Active Volcano?" discusses the potential dangers and the violent responses of lava to foreign objects.
Section 2.1: Nuclear Waste and Volcanoes
Now, what about hazardous materials like spent nuclear fuel?
Unfortunately, the lava's temperatures, while high (around 2,400 degrees Fahrenheit), are still not sufficient to melt the casings of nuclear fuel rods, which require temperatures exceeding 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Thus, throwing nuclear waste into a volcano would only leave the radioactive materials embedded in the newly formed rock, posing long-term contamination risks.
Section 2.2: The Sun as a Disposal Method
Some might wonder if launching waste into the Sun could be a solution.
However, this presents its own set of challenges. First, achieving the correct trajectory to ensure waste actually enters the Sun is complex. Rockets must decelerate to avoid merely entering an elliptical orbit.
Additionally, the risk of failure is a significant concern. If a rocket carrying dangerous materials were to explode during launch, it could scatter radioactive waste across vast areas of Earth—an unacceptable risk.
Finally, the cost of launching waste into space is astronomical. With approximately 250,000 tons of high-level nuclear waste globally, the estimated cost to dispose of it in the Sun could exceed $1.25 trillion.
In conclusion, neither volcanoes nor the Sun serves as viable waste disposal options. Volcanoes would function like ineffective incinerators, exacerbating pollution, while the challenges of space disposal are prohibitive in terms of safety and cost.
Instead, we must prioritize reduction and reuse strategies and improve our recycling efforts to address the mounting waste crisis effectively.