Understanding the Complexities of Gay Gang Members in Criminology
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study
I was taken aback when I came across the title of a recent article published in the esteemed journal, Criminology. The article, titled "I was a homo thug, now I'm just a homo": Gay gang members' desistence and persistence, comes from a professor at Old Dominion University’s Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice. At first glance, the title seemed perplexing, but upon reading, I found the content surprisingly enlightening.
The article's abstract outlines a growing interest in understanding why individuals leave gangs, especially considering the long-term negative consequences of gang involvement. Despite calls for more inclusive research that addresses LGBTQ issues, most studies still predominantly reflect heterosexual perspectives. This research utilizes in-depth interviews with 48 self-identified gay male gang members to investigate their reasons for either leaving or remaining in their gangs, as well as the impact of these choices on their identities and lifestyles. Notably, the study also contrasts experiences between those in predominantly straight gangs and those in gay gangs.
As I delved deeper, I noted that the title reflects a quote from a participant named Gary, who described his transition with the phrase, "I was a little homo thug, now I'm just a homo." It’s curious that the author opted to omit "little" in the title; such choices spark my curiosity regarding editorial decisions.
Chapter 1.1: Language and Accessibility in Research
A recurring theme in academic literature is the use of complex jargon. Terms like "desistence" and "persistence" can confuse readers unfamiliar with such language. Essentially, these terms boil down to the simple question: should one stay or leave? The article addresses the factors that influence whether gay gang members decide to remain in their criminal associations or break free. It raises an important point about the barriers presented by academic language, which often deters wider readership and understanding.
Furthermore, funding sources and their potential influence on research outcomes should be scrutinized. The author acknowledges support from the Racial Democracy, Crime, and Justice Network, as well as the University at Albany's Initiative for Women. This raises questions about the implications of such funding on the research focus.
Subsection 1.1.1: Reevaluating the Role of Identity
The research claims that sexual orientation is relevant to understanding gang dynamics. However, I question this assertion. If evidence emerges that sexual orientation significantly impacts gang involvement, that would warrant consideration, but I have yet to see it. The study examines participants from both gay gangs and ostensibly straight gangs, with many participants affiliated with notable gay gangs such as the "Boys of Bang" and the "Firing Squad."
The author provocatively asks whether gay gang members represent a new frontier in criminology. This notion seems at odds with the understanding that, regardless of sexual orientation, human behavior shares common threads. It is essential to avoid framing gay individuals as fundamentally different from their heterosexual counterparts.
Chapter 1.2: The Challenges of Social Constructs
Towards the conclusion of the article, the author acknowledges that traditional demographic factors, such as gender, may not significantly influence gang dynamics. This raises important considerations about the role of social constructs in academic discourse. For instance, the author admits to having different experiences than her participants based on her race, gender, and class—yet I contend that these constructs can distract from the more pressing issues at hand.
Another striking point is the demographic breakdown of the participants: 81% were Black, 10% White, 2% Latino, and 6% biracial. Such statistics highlight a stark disparity between racial representation and gang participation, challenging the notion that race is a definitive factor in gang involvement.
Chapter 2: Insights from Participants
The study reveals that many individuals cited family values and traditional masculinity as motivating factors for leaving gang life, suggesting a correlation between community stability and decisions to disengage from criminal activities. Interestingly, 92% of the participants had graduated high school, contradicting stereotypes about educational attainment among gang members.
The findings regarding gay gangs illustrate a distinct "us versus them" mentality, complicating the process of leaving. The author notes that kinship networks within these gangs can create strong ties that make exiting difficult.
The author's portrayal of participants' speech patterns also raises questions. While qualitative research often involves interpreting dialects, the use of colloquialisms may inadvertently introduce bias.
In conclusion, while the research presents valuable insights, it falls short of drawing definitive conclusions about the relevance of sexual orientation in gang dynamics. The discussion on heteronormativity, while important, may overshadow more significant factors at play. Ultimately, the emphasis on sexual identity may distract from the broader realities of human behavior and societal structures.
As we continue to explore the complexities of gang culture and identity, it is crucial to approach these discussions with an open mind and a commitment to understanding the multifaceted nature of human experiences.
Be Safe, and please share these articles and videos.
For the Police Sciences editions of Ten8, an item of science, peer-reviewed literature, or technical aspect of policing is explored.
Ten8 is a more personal and journal-style series of articles by Dr. Michael Wood Jr. that will center around police management, criminology, and policing. The articles will not be the typical citation-driven essay style of Dr. Wood. For those articles, please see Dr. Wood's page, published books, especially The Business of Policing: Volume I: Crime and Punishments in the 21st Century, or published literature highlighted by The Business of Policing Volume II: Managing Ethical Police Conduct. Here, Dr. Wood will post frequent thought streams on his personal philosophies.