iPad Photo Editing Showdown: Lightroom vs. Pixelmator Photo
Written on
The iPad, with its stunning display and robust processing capabilities, is an appealing option for photo editing. The question arises: can it serve as a substitute for a MacBook in a photographer's workflow? Which applications offer the best results?
To explore this, I selected two images from my recent shoots to process using my typical Getty stock photography approach. My standard procedure includes:
- Evaluating the lighting conditions: Are they flat, overly bright, or too dark?
- Making targeted adjustments to the lighting
- Inspecting for sensor spots and dust
- Removing distracting elements for better composition
- Correcting any lens distortions
- Cropping and scaling the images
The primary aim of this workflow is to achieve clear, high-quality images rather than creating artistic interpretations; that task is reserved for others who transform stock photos into art.
Both images present challenges. Taken on bright, sunny days, they exhibit a broad dynamic range, with the sun positioned behind each subject, complicating the editing process further.
Now, I will assess whether Lightroom or Pixelmator Photo can rectify these issues. Both applications are running on an iPad Pro 12.9”, and I utilized an Apple Pencil for editing. Typically, I rely on Adobe Lightroom on an iMac 27”. Can either app make me forget my iMac?
Initial Review of the Photos
The first image depicts a beach, captured with an iPhone 12 Pro Max in wide-screen mode.
I aim to reduce the sky's brightness and enhance contrast while revealing more detail in the rocks. A straight horizon would also be beneficial.
The second image features a gorilla, taken with a Canon 5D Mark IV.
While I appreciate the pose, the background is overly distracting and too bright. Darkening the image could compromise the fur's detail. Additionally, I’d like to enhance the visibility of the gorilla’s eyes.
Accessing the Images
The beach photo, taken with an iPhone 12 Pro Max, appeared directly on my iPad thanks to iCloud, eliminating the need for transfer.
The gorilla image was retrieved from the 5D’s SD card using a USB-C dongle to upload it to the camera roll on my iPad Pro, which functioned seamlessly.
I organized the two images into an album. Although it’s just two photos, my library contains over 100,000 images, making specific searches challenging.
With each update to Apple Photos, usability seems to decline; it’s a frustrating trend.
The Beach
Pixelmator Photo
I'm not a frequent user of Pixelmator Photo, which caused a slight delay in locating the camera roll—tapping the cog icon in the top right toggles between file and camera roll views.
Pixelmator maintains a files interface even when displaying the camera roll. I duplicated the photo to avoid any mishaps during editing.
The horizon needs leveling, so let's address that.
As mentioned, the rocks appear shadowy, and the sky is excessively bright. I tapped on "Edit" and selected the machine learning (ML) feature.
While the rocks gained more detail, the sky became even brighter. I want to tone down the sky without impacting the rocks.
Pixelmator lacks local adjustment features but allows color adjustments. I reduced the brightness for blue and purple tones, which yielded minimal results.
I attempted a curves adjustment on the blue and purple channels; this improved the sky slightly but distorted other areas. I subsequently dialed back the blue curves.
My satisfaction with the results was moderate; the rocks remained too dark, and I desired more prominence for the blue sky behind the clouds.
While I appreciate Pixelmator Photo's capabilities for global adjustments, it lacks essential features like "dodge" and "burn." Most outdoor photos face a wide dynamic range, necessitating techniques to lighten shadows and darken highlights effectively.
The intelligent software on the iPhone minimizes the need for such adjustments, but these tools remain crucial for elevating a photograph.
Controlling brightness adjustments is not just about revealing detail; it also guides the viewer's focus within the image.
Humans instinctively gravitate toward the brightest areas in a photo. Lacking control over this aspect is a significant drawback.
Lightroom
I’ve used Adobe Lightroom since its initial release on Windows and MacOS in 2007. It was crafted for photographers seeking a simpler alternative to Photoshop. I was thrilled to see it available on the iPad, but how does it perform on this device?
Correcting the uneven horizon was straightforward.
Like Pixelmator Photo, I utilized the automatic option to adjust the lighting.
The rocks in the foreground are more detailed, but the small island in the bay remains too dark, as does the coastline on the right.
I could apply a global adjustment, but I prefer a more targeted approach. Lightroom, like its desktop counterparts, offers selective adjustments—fantastic!
- Brush selection (paint adjustments)
- Radial selection (adjustments confined to a resizable ellipse)
- Linear selection (similar to a graduated filter)
I used a brush selection on the coastline, tapping the cliffs to set an anchor point. I increased the brightness and 'painted' over the cliffs, revealing the details—success!
Next, I applied a radial adjustment to the island, partly to test this feature and partly because I view it as shining a spotlight, which I find appealing. The effect is strongest at the center.
Finally, I executed a linear adjustment for the sky, darkening the blues to accentuate cloud patterns.
I am satisfied with the outcome; detail in both the sky and rocks is preserved. Thanks to local adjustments, no detail was lost in the water or sand.
The Gorilla in the Glare
This image suffers from blown highlights. Typically, I'd expose for the highlights, but due to the dark subject, I'd likely end up with a silhouette.
Pixelmator Photo
I applied the ML feature to see what improvements I could achieve.
The results were minimal; the grass appeared slightly darker, and there was a minor reduction in the brightness of the gorilla's fur. More adjustments were necessary.
I aggressively reduced the brightness and highlights, which yielded significant improvements, albeit lacking the finesse of ML. However, numerous distracting highlights persisted in the background, which I found unacceptable.
Lacking selective editing options, I hoped a curves adjustment might help. Unfortunately, it didn't yield much difference, leading me to abandon further edits.
What about the blemishes on the gorilla’s face? The healing brush provided a simple solution, and while zoomed in, I lightened the shadows.
Lightening the shadows restored some detail to the gorilla, but I also sought to enhance the visibility of its eyes, a task I couldn’t complete.
Here is the final result.
I felt disappointed; the background remained distracting, and the eyes were not distinct.
Adobe Lightroom
I tapped the auto button to assess the free adjustments available.
Lightroom effectively revealed details in the gorilla’s fur and diminished the glare on the grass. The background shrubbery also appeared less glaring.
To address the spots on the gorilla, I used the healing brush.
Utilizing the healing brush in clone mode was straightforward. Zooming in highlighted the newfound detail in the gorilla's fur.
Next, I aimed to minimize glare with a linear adjustment on the grass in the lower left.
This adjustment is graduated, starting strong and tapering off. I dragged from the bottom left, stopping just before the gorilla.
I reduced the overall exposure and highlights; some shadows remained dark, but I accepted this outcome. Next, I focused on the bush behind the gorilla.
I lowered the exposure and highlights to reduce glare, and I applied four additional smaller radial adjustments to the gorilla's head, achieving excellent results.
I added another linear adjustment to darken the top left of the image, but I couldn’t apply this to the foreground shrubbery, as it overlapped with the gorilla.
Using brush adjustments proved to be the best solution.
This approach worked well; I utilized the Apple Pencil for precise control over the adjustments. I lowered the exposure and highlights, significantly reducing most of the glare.
However, some glare remained, prompting me to try the healing brush again, though with limited success. It was challenging to find leaves of the right shape to clone without glare.
Finally, I employed a radial adjustment to enhance the visibility of the gorilla’s eyes.
And the Winner Is...
Ultimately, Adobe Lightroom emerges as the clear winner in this comparison. I say this reluctantly, as I dislike their subscription model and their tendency to push cloud services. I already utilize a cloud solution, making another unnecessary.
Nonetheless, the selective adjustments in Lightroom offer exceptional control. I primarily modified exposure, highlights, and shadows, but nearly every feature in Lightroom can be adjusted selectively, encompassing a comprehensive range from de-hazing to sharpness.
While Pixelmator Photo is a clever tool with innovative machine learning capabilities, its lack of selective editing tools renders it less suitable for serious photographers in my opinion.
Could Pixelmator Photo replace Lightroom on an iMac? For standard stock photography, I believe Lightroom on an iPad can suffice. The essential adjustments are available, complemented by the functionality of the Apple Pencil.