AI’s Presence in Our Lives

Much like the introduction of the automobile or the lightbulb, AI is transforming our daily routines and work environments. Its convenience and accessibility have made it a prominent force across various sectors, including manufacturing, healthcare, education, design, programming, retail, and transportation. As AI tools become more common, they simplify tasks that were once time-consuming and labor-intensive, allowing humans to delegate responsibilities to intelligent systems.

The Growing Use of AI for Writing

A variety of AI-powered tools now exist that can generate text based on prompts, ranging from simple autocomplete suggestions to complex, structured paragraphs. This capability allows writers to produce content quickly and with minimal effort. Tools like Jasper and Jenni enable users to create human-like text that can easily be mistaken for original work.

However, while these tools are impressive, they introduce a series of moral dilemmas that deserve scrutiny. As someone passionate about both writing and technology, I find myself torn.

The Training of AI Writers

It’s essential to understand that computers do not possess independent thought. AI writing tools, such as OpenAI’s GPT-3, rely on data created by humans for their training. With around 570 GB of information sourced from approximately 10% of the internet, the question arises: If AI generates content based on existing human work, can we genuinely consider it original?

While AI may produce unique outputs by predicting subsequent words or phrases, it operates within a framework filled with pre-existing content. This raises concerns about the potential for unintentional plagiarism, particularly for those of us who value originality in our work.

Misrepresenting AI-Generated Content

Many authors advocate for the use of AI in crafting long-form content, claiming that these tools can simplify the writing process. However, I view this practice as dishonest. Presenting AI-generated text as one’s own without significant modification constitutes a form of deceit.

It is one thing to utilize AI as a writing aid; it’s another to claim full authorship over content created by a machine. This practice undermines the integrity of genuine writers who invest their time and energy in crafting unique works.

AI Content vs. Human Creativity

Some may argue that AI-generated content can be as valuable as that produced by humans. However, I firmly believe that a piece created by an AI can never replicate the depth of emotion and creativity that a human being brings to their work. AI can only simulate human thought and emotion but cannot genuinely experience them.

While AI can assist in the writing process, relying on it entirely diminishes the effort of real writers.

AI as a Supportive Tool

I am not opposed to the use of AI as a writing assistant. Personally, I have found tools like Jasper beneficial for brainstorming and overcoming writer’s block. By providing topics and suggestions, AI can help spark creativity, but I draw the line at allowing it to generate complete pieces on my behalf.

The Future of AI in Writing

The debate surrounding AI in writing is likely to continue, as we grapple with its implications. While I am excited about the potential of AI to assist writers, I am wary of its potential to replace them. The creative process is inherently human, and as technology advances, we must remain vigilant to ensure that AI serves to enhance our skills rather than diminish them.

Ultimately, the question remains: Will AI be a valuable ally for writers, or will it threaten the essence of creativity? Only time will tell.

> “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.” — Dr. Ian Malcolm, Jurassic Park

Originally published at https://sidehustleroad.com on July 27, 2022.