Elon Musk's Controversial Ties to Russian Oligarchs Revealed
Written on
Chapter 1: The Financial Backing Behind Musk's Twitter Acquisition
Recent developments have brought to light some unsettling connections regarding Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter. A lawsuit filed by former Twitter employees alleging Musk's breach of arbitration agreements has unveiled surprising details about the sources of financing he utilized for the purchase. Notably, some of the funds are linked to Russian oligarchs closely associated with President Putin, indicating a possible influence from the Kremlin.
While the connection is not as straightforward as some reports suggest, the implications of Musk’s behavior since taking over Twitter raise significant concerns.
Section 1.1: Investors with Questionable Connections
A court filing disclosed various investors involved in Musk's Twitter deal, leading to some alarming revelations. For instance, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, led by staunch Trump supporters Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, was a major investor. Since Musk's takeover, he has noticeably shifted his political stance to the right and shown support for Trump, which raises questions about the timing of these changes.
Other investors, such as P. Diddy, also raised eyebrows, but one firm appeared innocuous at first glance: 8VC. However, upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that the firm has deeper ties to Russian interests.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Russian Connection
Key members of 8VC's investment team, Jack Moshkovich and Denis Aven, are children of Russian oligarchs Vadim Moshkovich and Petr Aven. While Vadim has made his fortune in agriculture, Petr has been a prominent figure in Russia’s largest investment bank and is part of Putin's inner circle. Both Moshkovich and Aven faced sanctions from the West due to the Kremlin's actions in Ukraine.
It's important to clarify that the mere involvement of their sons in Musk's financing does not definitively imply control by their fathers or the Kremlin over the deal. The exact roles of Jack and Denis in this context remain unclear, and no solid proof exists that Musk is directly influenced by them.
Section 1.2: Changes in Musk's Public Stance
Despite the lack of concrete evidence linking Musk to Kremlin influence, his behavior since acquiring Twitter has raised eyebrows. In 2022, while orchestrating his financing, Musk made public statements suggesting that Russia should retain Crimea and that Ukraine should cease its NATO aspirations. Such remarks were detrimental to discussions surrounding Western security against Russian aggression.
Moreover, Musk proposed that referendums should take place in regions annexed by Russia, despite the fact that these areas had been flooded with Russian settlers, leaving many native Ukrainians displaced or deceased. This marked a stark contrast to Musk's previous criticisms of Putin and Russia, leading to speculation that he may have changed his tone to appease his financial backers.
Chapter 2: The Implications of Musk's Actions in the Ukraine Conflict
In 2023, Musk's involvement in the Ukraine conflict escalated when Ukrainian forces relied on his Starlink technology for communication after Russian attacks disabled mobile networks. Starlink not only facilitated personal communication but also enabled the remote operation of drones, an essential tool for Ukrainian defense. However, Musk controversially ordered Starlink to be disabled during a Ukrainian offensive, resulting in the loss of connectivity for armed Ukrainian submarine drones preparing for an attack.
Shortly thereafter, evidence emerged that Russian forces were also utilizing Starlink, raising serious questions about how this technology was being used.
This troubling behavior continued into 2024, with Musk opposing further aid to Ukraine and asserting that Putin was “unbeatable.” Such claims undermine Western efforts to support Ukraine, which is crucial for maintaining stability in the region. Additionally, the EU recently alerted Musk that X/Twitter was a primary platform for Russian propaganda, urging better moderation, a request that has largely gone unaddressed.
Musk's defense of Pavel Durov, the Russian founder of Telegram, who was arrested for allowing child exploitation and drug trafficking on his platform, further complicates the narrative.
While it cannot be definitively proven that Musk's actions stem from Kremlin influence, the pattern of behavior is troubling. His association with 8VC alone warrants deeper investigation into his relationships with foreign investors.
Thanks for reading. Support from readers like you enables this kind of content. To show your support or gain early access to articles, consider following my project, Planet Earth & Beyond.
(Originally published on PlanetEarthAndBeyond.co)
Sources: The London Economic, Eurotoday, Cyber News, Yahoo, EU Today, Planet Earth & Beyond, The Guardian, NPR, The New Voice Of Ukraine